Academic work matters to me because complex dentistry contains uncertainty. Research cannot make every decision for us, but it can make our assumptions more visible and our recommendations more defensible.
Evidence without dogma.
Evidence-based dentistry is sometimes misunderstood as following published research mechanically. That is not how I use it.
Good clinical decisions integrate the best available evidence, clinical expertise, biological realities, treatment feasibility and the values and preferences of the individual patient.
The objective is not to make dentistry sound scientific. It is to make decisions more thoughtful, transparent and defensible.
Selected academic roles
Research interests
Prosthodontic rehabilitation
Restorative decision-making, worn and failing dentitions, fixed and removable prosthodontics, and long-term treatment outcomes.
Implant dentistry
Implant treatment planning, full-arch treatment, implant prosthetics, peri-implant considerations and clinically relevant outcomes.
Evidence synthesis
Systematic reviews, umbrella reviews, interpretation of conflicting evidence and translation of research into clinical decisions.
Evidence-based dentistry
How evidence, clinician judgement and patient preferences should interact in real clinical decisions.
What this means for patients
Academic credentials do not make a treatment plan automatically correct. Their value is in the habits they should encourage: asking better questions, recognizing uncertainty, comparing alternatives, examining outcomes critically and being willing to change a recommendation when the evidence or clinical situation changes.
For a patient, this should translate into treatment that is easier to explain: why this option, why now, what are the alternatives, what are the limitations, and what happens if we do less?
Selected peer-reviewed work & edited books
Selected clinical, methodological and scholarly contributions, with publication types distinguished.
- Artificial intelligence in dental education — review (2023).503
- Advancements in prosthodontics (edited book) — edited volume (2025). Book listing ↗
- Managing soft-tissue deficiencies around implants — clinical publication.
- Patient satisfaction in medicine and dentistry — review (2020).195
- 188
- Implant bridges: how different materials perform — laboratory study (2025).38
- Single-implant overdentures in older adults — evidence commentary (2024).9
- 84
Explore the work
These links are provided as supporting professional context rather than as a substitute for the clinical conversation.
Research impact
Google Scholar citation record and publication metrics.
For researchers & academic collaborators
I remain open to serious collaborations in prosthodontics, implant dentistry, evidence synthesis, clinical decision-making and related areas where the research question is clinically meaningful and the methodology can answer it credibly.
Academic and editorial enquiries can be sent through the contact page.
Clinical depth should make treatment clearer — not more complicated.
For academic collaboration, invited writing, evidence-synthesis projects or professional enquiries, please get in touch.